By Jueseppi B.
Absofuckinglutely correct verdict brought back by this jury, the prosecution failed miserably just like in O.J's case, the jury can not convict on assumptions, only on evidence, whether we citizen like the verdict or not. Jurors can only find a defdendant guilty, and convict if there is evidence. "Beyond a reasonable doubt" means just that, you can NOT convict based on emotion, there has to be evidence to convict.
Absofuckinglutely correct verdict brought back by this jury, the prosecution failed miserably just like in O.J's case, the jury can not convict on assumptions, only on evidence, whether we citizen like the verdict or not. Jurors can only find a defdendant guilty, and convict if there is evidence. "Beyond a reasonable doubt" means just that, you can NOT convict based on emotion, there has to be evidence to convict.
No comments:
Post a Comment